Iridient x transformer purchase12/25/2023 Because it is smaller and lighter than the equivalent DSLR lens, your hands will not get tired even after a full day of shooting. The only zoom I have is the 50-140mm f2.8 (equivalent to 70-200mm). It is great for landscapes, architecture, and low light situations. It focuses very close to the subject, it has very little distortion and it is extremely sharp. The 35mm f2.0 makes the camera very “crowd friendly”, making it great for street photography. When I’m shooting handheld I setup the camera in advance and tend to lock all the command buttons at the back to avoid pressing them by mistake when holding the camera.Īll the lenses I have are very sharp. Due to its size, it is easy to press buttons that you did not intend to press. The Fuji will probably feel "strange" at the beginning because it is much more compact, but that is true to all mirrorless cameras. That camera has not seen the light of the day since I got the X-T2 at the end of 2016. I have a Nikon D700 that I mainly used with the 24-70mm f2.8. Now, let the contrary opinions commence!! On the other hand, I've had no problem with primes - and it's wonderful to be able to carry several of them in a small bag! When they're good, they're very sharp edge to edge, but when they're randomly in a bad mood, images are ruined. I suspect the OIS, which both of these lenses have, so I need to experiment with having it switched off all the time. The 10-24 was only ever good at the edges from 14mm upwards, seems to have trouble focusing (lots of shots are blurry despite the focus confirmation saying otherwise) and sometimes has the same odd edge effect as the 18-55. Fuji Australia say it's 'within parameters'. My 18-55 randomly defocuses the edges - one photo can be beautifully sharp at the edges, the next, blurry at the edges but still sharp in the middle. Even using the x-rite colour checker doesn't compensate for this - I need to experiment further but whereas with the D800, colours just come together with the colour checker, with the X-T2, it just doesn't happen (some reds come out really off, for example).Īnd those lenses you mention, Martin, are quirky! Or maybe I've just had bad luck with my copies. Skin tones are a good example - great if the light is good, unnatural and ugly in overcast conditions or shade. Colours are quirky - great in good light, but often dirty-looking under cloud or in low light. However, image quality is very mixed (and I guess you're going to get lots of different opinions on this). Everything people say about this camera being a joy to use is true. The portability is great (fits in a laptop bag/briefcase well), meaning I take photos in situations I wouldn't otherwise. I have very mixed feelings about the X-T2. I currently use an X-T2 alongside a Nikon D800, the idea being that the X-T2 is the nicely portable, go-anywhere stock camera, and the D800 (overkill for Alamy stock) with primes is the high-quality potential fine art camera.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |